FINAL DRAFT: Writing Project #3: Researched Argument and Critical Essay – Final Draft [CYBERBULLY]

FINAL DRAFT: Writing Project #3: Researched Argument Essay – Final Draft
We have spent significant time in this course learning how to respond to, analyze and synthesize information and ideas. For the final formal writing assignment of the semester you will draw on those same skills to help you form an argument of your own in response to a focused research question. You will draw on ideas from the classes core reading, alongside your own research, ideas and experiences to help shape your argument—the purpose of your argument should be to negotiate a solution to a problem. You will consider your own claim alongside counter or opposing viewpoints and attempt to find a common ground. Your voice should dominate this essay; use research sources as support for your ideas.

Skills: The purpose of English 111 is to help you develop and practice writing and thinking skills essential to your success in college and in your professional life beyond school. Drawing on Bloom’s Taxonomy of Learning Domains, we will focus on developing writerly “moves” that characterize strong written communication. This assignment will ask you to practice the following writing skills: Analyzing, Evaluating, and Synthesizing.

Knowledge: This assignment will draw from knowledge in most of the course learning objectives for English 111, but particular focus will be on developing skills in the following:

(1) Compose texts that exhibit appropriate rhetorical choices, including attention to audience, purpose, context, genre, culture, and convention.
(4) Analyze and synthesize researched information to develop and support original claims.
(7) Employ correct techniques of style, formatting, and documentation when incorporating quotes, paraphrases, and summaries from sources into compositions.
Now that you have synthesized the ideas of multiple sources on a common theme, you might begin to consider other areas in your life where you might apply this information.

For this final writing project, you will write a researched argument about an issue affecting your future career field, your major field, your community or an issue described in the readings you’ve done from the book. This paper is your own argument, but you should take into account what you’ve learned during this course: begin by showing the conversation your paper is responding to (“they say”), have a clear statement of your own argument (“I say”), include quotes and incorporate them smoothly, point out possible objections to your argument, use appropriate transitions, and explain why the issue matters. You might also con- sider adding metacommentary and finding ways to include your own voice even though this is academic writing.

Below is a possible structure for this argument. you will compose a thesis statement, support your thesis with evidence from your research and address a counter argument.

One Strategy for Organizing an Argument-the Classical Argument:
Cast your memory to what you know about the Golden Age of Greece. . . . remember those clever Greeks formed one of the world’s first democracies. Because they were not blessed with the printing presses of the marvels of television or the internet, they relied on oratory (speech) as the prime way of communicating with and persuading voters. Over time, Aristotle and his cronies (the classical rhetoricians) noticed the most successful and persuasive orators tended to structure their speeches in fairly regular ways. Very thoughtfully, Aristotle recorded a “map” of those arrangements for posterity:

Opening (Exordium): Gains the audience’s attention and interest.
Background (Narratio): Provides the context or history of the situation.
Definition of Issues (Explicatio): Defines or limits terms and explains issues.
Thesis (Partitio): States the position that is to be argued.
Proof (Confirmatio): Supports and develops the thesis.
Refutation (Refutatio): Answers opposing arguments.
Conclusion (Peroratio): Summarizes the arguments (if appropriate) and sometimes urges the audience to action.
Aristotle taught his students the most important parts of a speech (or in our case, an essay) are the opening, the thesis, the proof, and the conclusion; the only necessary parts for all occasions or purposes, or all readers are the thesis and proof.

Remember that this classical arrangement is a guide, not a rigid form to follow. As writers tackle new projects, they make their own decisions about which of these “parts” best suits the rhetorical context for their writing assignment. Contemplating purpose and audience helps writers make those decisions.

So, once again, as you use this arrangement in here or in other classes, be sure to remember that it is not cast in stone. And that’s what makes it so useful; the arrangement is flexible and can be adapted to many writing situations.


Length: 6-8 pages (2000 word minimum), double spaced
Use standard fonts and sizes (Times New Roman 12, Calibri 11)
The final draft of the essay should utilize a formal documentation format (MLA/APA)
You will need to include at least five (5) sources for this paper including at least four of the core readings and one additional research source

Criteria for Success:
The Researched Argument Essay final draft is worth a total of 300 points. A successful finished product will meet the criteria for the rubric below:

Researched Argument Essay Rubric
Researched Argument Essay Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEngaging Introduction
Engaging and effective introduction with sufficient background information given on the subject.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThesis Statement
Strong thesis statement in the form of an enthymeme making a debatable claim and offering clear reasons.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization and Content
Clear and effective organization of the argument in support of the thesis.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCounter Argument
Effective representation and refutation of counter argument.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEffective Use of Sources
Effective use of direct quotation and paraphrasing of sources.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMeaningful Conclusion
Conclusion offering insight into the significance or the larger context of this argument, a call-to-action or meaningful resolution.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMeets Assignment Criteria
A minimum of 2000 words (about 6-8 pages double spaced).
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting and Documentation
Follows the guidelines for APA or MLA formatting and documentation. This includes formatting for the paper, in-text citations and a bibliography.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and Usage
Mostly follows the conventions of standard written English.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRevision
Effective revision choices, including consideration of peer/instructor feedback.
20 pts
Total Points: 200
a: Overview of the topic/ problem/ issue
b: Thesis/ Claim in the form of a “should” or “must” statement – a solution to the problem
2] BACKGROUND: 1 to 2 paragraphs
a: History of the problem
b: Definitions – explanation of key terms.
a: Point1: Evidence {1-3 paragraphs]
b: Point 2: Topic sentence [1-3 paragraphs]
c; Point3: [1-3 Paragraphs]
4] COUNTER ARGUMENT:[ 2 paragraphs]
a: Opposition
b: Refutation
a: sum up
b: call to action
[6-8 pages] Not counting title page or reference page[s]
Minimum of 2000 words

Looking for this or a Similar Assignment? Click below to Place your Order Instantly!