2200 words, 15-20 references [must include high-quality academic peer-reviewed journal articles, reputable consulting company or law firm recent reports; between 2010-now]
Two countries: USA and South Korea
First, follow the structure:
Executive summary
Table of content
Introduction 100 words
Question 1 – 660 words
1.1 parties of ER system of country USA & South Korea [220 words]
1.2 labor laws of ER system of country USA & South Korea [220 words]
1.3 processes of ER system of countryUSA & South Korea[220 words]
Question 2 – 660 words
Country USA influences [330 words]
Country South Korea influences [330 words]
Question3 – 660 words
Country USA risk & opportunity [330 words]
Country South Korea risk & opportunity [330 words]
Conclusion – 100 words
Reference list
Assessment details
This assessment asks you to compare and contrastemployment relations systems in two countries [one an LME and one a CME country] and the opportunities and risks each present for HRM practices in thefast-food industry in each country.【LME – Liberal market economies;CME – coordinated market economies】
Learning Outcomes
- Articulate and apply key global theories and concepts of employment relations relevant to to companies
- Compare and contrast employment relations theories, and practices to contribute to work practices
- Evaluate the influence of stakeholders and policies on international employment relations, to develop relevant organisational policies and practices
Address the following questions in your report:
- What are the main differences and similarities of elements [parties, laws, processes] of the employment relations systems between these two countries?
- What are the main parties of the employment relations system of your two chosen countries?
- What are the relevant labor laws of the employment relations system of your two chosen countries?
- What are the processes of the employment relations system of your two chosen countries?
- What does your comparison reveal about the influence of the local country ER model and culture on HRM strategies and processes at the organizational level?
- What are the opportunities and risks for effective HRM practices in the local fast-food industry in each country, given each country’s ER model and social context?
Rubric – read carefully
Quality of analysis and evaluation of 2 ER systems 14 marks
Quality of analysis of 2 contrasting ER systems and evaluation of influence of local ER models on HRM practices
Excellent and detailed analysis of 2 contrasting ER systems and comprehensive evaluation of influence of local ER models on HRM practices
Evidence-based assessment of opportunities and risks for effective HRM practices in eachER system 11 marks
Demonstrated research skills and depth and accuracy of assessment of opportunities and risks for effective HRM practices in each ER system
High quality evidence-based assessment of opportunities and risks for effective HRM practices in each ER system
Presentation & Referencing 5 marks
Clarity of presentation, use and proper citation of scholarly and other sources [in text and in reference list]
Excellent presentation of report and consistent use and citation of scholarly and other sources [in text and in reference list]