NEED A PERFECT PAPER? PLACE YOUR FIRST ORDER AND SAVE 15% USING COUPON:

Signature Assessment Part C [Assessment of Learning] & Signature Assessment Part D [Reflection of Teaching]

Part C Directions: Data Analysis The teacher candidate will evaluate the lesson and critically evaluate the effectiveness of the planning, resources, instructional strategies, and assessment. In addition, the teacher candidate will reflect upon the engagement and interest of the students involved in the instruction using the following prompts [11-point font, Arial, Single-Spaced, 1 inch margins all around]
There is an excel sheet that is attached that needs to be completed as well.
Part D Directions: Reflection on Teaching Teacher candidates will reflect on the lesson and critically answer the following questions thoroughly and thoughtfully. Using specific anecdotal evidence, the candidate will reflect upon the engagement and interest of the students involved in the instruction using the following prompts [11-point font, Arial, Single-Spaced, 1 inch margins].

 

Signature Assessment Part C: Assessment of Learning

Name Name
UWA Course UWA Course
School School
Teacher Teacher
Part C Directions: Data AnalysisThe teacher candidate will evaluate the lesson and critically evaluate the effectiveness of the planning, resources, instructional strategies, and assessment.  In addition, the teacher candidate will reflect upon the engagement and interest of the students involved in the instruction using the following prompts [11-point font, Arial, Single-Spaced, 1 inch margins all around]
Assessment of Learning

 

Your assessment results should provide a clear communication of performance aligned with the key knowledge and skills identified for the standard[s]. Select a high, medium, and low assessment sample to discuss further. Be sure to cover names to ensure anonymity and scan or photograph student work/assessment samples for submission.[2 points for writing and presentation]

 

1.  Discuss the high, medium, and low assessment samples.Highlight strengths and weaknesses within the assessment samples. Analyze and interpret the student’s/students’ performance. Be sure to cover the name to ensure anonymity, and scan or photograph student work/assessment samples for submission.2 points
2. Submit the UWA created Excel worksheet with pre/post assessment scores for all participating P12 students.2 points

 

4. Present detailed and accurate data in a clear display [raw data, a graph, or a chart] for the whole class [or the identified student in the case of the collaborative education assessment].Your assessment results should provide a clear communication of performance aligned with the key knowledge and skills identified for the standard[s]. 2 points
5. Write a narrative:2 points

a. Were the lesson standard[s], key knowledge, and skills met?

b. How do you know?

c. Which individuals had trouble and why as well as which individuals did well and why?

c. Identify any relevant patterns in the student data.

d. How useful was the assessment tool?

e. What instructional changes would you make as a result of reviewing the assessment data?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RUBRIC

Signature Assessment Part C:  Assessment of Learning

 

     Category Unacceptable – 0 Requires Revision – 1 Target – 2 Score
Representative student work samples are included.

 

 

Student assessment samples are not attached Student assessment sample[s] are attached but sample[s] do not represent an adequately diverse outcome

OR

Student assessment sample[s] are attached but samples do not adequately highlight student strengths, weaknesses, and possible patterns

Student assessment samples are attached; samples clearly represent a high, medium, and low level outcome

OR

Student assessment sample[s] are attached; sample[s] clearly highlight strengths, weaknesses, and possible patterns

 
Assessment data is properly entered in the UWA created Excel worksheet. UWA created Excel worksheet was not submitted; pre- or post- instruction data is missing in the Excel worksheet UWA created Excel worksheet with pre- and post- instruction data was submitted, but data was not properly entered in to the worksheet UWA created Excel worksheet with pre- and post- instruction data was submitted, data was properly entered in to the worksheet so charts can be generated.  
Assessment data is appropriately represented for the narrative. Assessment data are not displayed in graphic format; data from one or more assessments is missing Assessment data for all assessments are displayed in graphic; format choice is awkward or difficult to read Assessment data for all assessments are displayed in graphic; format[s] is easy to understand  
Assessment narrative highlights patterns and represents accurate understanding of student status.

[InTASC 6, 7, 8; CAEP 1.1, 1.4]     

One or more prompt is not addressed; detail is insufficient; data analysis is faulty leading to inaccurate understanding of individual student status; recognition of data patterns is not demonstrated All prompts are addressed, but detail is limited; data analysis is accurate, but is not connected to individual student status All prompts are addressed in detail; data analysis is accurate, and connects to individual student status; demonstrates recognition of data patterns  
Reflection demonstrates insight into the planning and teaching process, and suggested modifications align with described reflections.

[InTASC 7, 9; CAEP 1.1, 1.2,  1.4]     

Reflection demonstrates a lack of insight into the planning and teaching process; reflection is missing for one or more prompt; detail is insufficient; no changes are suggested Reflection demonstrates insight into the planning and teaching process; all prompts are addressed but detail is limited; instructional changes are suggested, but are superficial or do not align with described reflections on effectiveness Reflection demonstrates insight into the planning and teaching process; all prompts are addressed in detail; instructional changes suggested align with described reflections on effectiveness  
Narrative is professionally presented Writing involves many errors [more than 7] Writing involves few errors [no more than 6] Writing is virtually free of all writing errors [no more than 3]  
Total Score        

 

Looking for this or a Similar Assignment? Click below to Place your Order Instantly!